This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2025. It is now read-only.
add unnecessary_library_name to recommended#198
Merged
devoncarew merged 3 commits intomainfrom Aug 7, 2024
Merged
Conversation
parlough
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2024
Contributor
parlough
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! I imagine this will be a big simplicity and education win for lots of projects :)
mosuem
pushed a commit
to dart-lang/core
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
* add unnecessary_library_name to recommended * update the workflow config * link to the lint's docs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
unnecessary_library_nameto the recommended lint setunnecessary_library_nameto recommended dart-lang/core#823Contribution guidelines:
dart format.Note that many Dart repos have a weekly cadence for reviewing PRs - please allow for some latency before initial review feedback.